Climate Change Strategy

ST Engineering recognises the risks and opportunities presented by climate change to our business.We are committed to communicating our approach and strategy for climate mitigation, adaptation and resilience to our stakeholders.

Climate Scenarios Analysis

We have assessed physical and transition risks for the Group’s business to understand the climate-related risks and opportunities. We identify risks associated with physical hazards to our facilities and operations from climate events. We also consider evolving climate-related regulations, expectations from customers and investors, alongside technology and market shifts requiring the adoption of new technologies.

Scenarios and Methodology

Our analysis is based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) climate scenarios taken from the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report. Our physical risk assessment includes the use of a third-party climate risk analytics platform while our transition risk assessment is informed by current available knowledge on policy, technology and market developments.

Physical Risks

Moderate Climate Change

SSP2-4.5

Business-as-usual scenario reflecting current emissions trajectory. Carbon emissions would remain high until 2050, before starting to decline post-2050 but no net-zero is achieved.


RISK ASSESSED
Extreme weather · Temperature rise · Sea level rise

TIME HORIZONS
Short (≤1 yr) · Medium (2–5 yrs) · Long (to 2050)

Transition Risks

Low Climate Change Scenario

SSP1-2.6

Global economy is oriented towards low material growth, resource and energy intensity. In line with the Paris Agreement’s aim of limiting the average global temperature rise to 1.5°C by 2100.


RISK ASSESSED
Policy · Technology · Market · Reputation

TIME HORIZONS
Short (≤1 yr) · Medium (2–5 yrs) · Long (to 2035)

Assessment of Physical Risks

We prioritised the Group’s sites for the physical risk assessment based on their asset value and financial materiality. We ran a desktop assessment using a third-party climate risk analytics platform to assess the exposure and potential impact of physical hazards to these sites, considering factors such as the site’s geolocation and asset value. We reviewed these desktop findings with facility owners to validate them against on-the-ground conditions.

Assessment of Transition Risks

Our assessment evaluated four key categories of transition risks to understand the potential impact on our operations and strategy. They include policy risk, technology risk, market risk and reputation risk. The long list of transition risks was assessed by our business areas and for their potential impact.

Residual Risk Level Assessment and Risk Management

After corroborating the desktop findings with the facility owners, our businesses categorised the identified physical hazards into Key, Tier 2 or Emerging Risks, in line with the Group’s ERM Framework. Our businesses then assessed the residual risk level, after taking into consideration mitigation measures, for Key and Emerging Risks.

Climate-related Risks

Physical Risks

Physical risk exposure for the Group’s assets in the short to medium term is low. The Group will continue to monitor long-term climate trends and adopt necessary measures if required.

Transition Risks

No short-term transition risks have been identified for the Group. Transition risk is assessed to be medium in the medium-term and low in the long-term.

Climate-related Opportunities

While climate change presents challenges, it also creates strategic opportunities for organisations to deliver innovative solutions. We identify opportunities where our capabilities align with growing demand for sustainable technologies, including clean energy solutions, climate change mitigation technologies and adaptation services.

Limitations in Climate Scenario Analysis

The SSP climate scenarios referenced in this report are based on the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report. These scenarios are theoretical models and should not be interpreted as forecasts. Additionally, the third-party analytics tool used for physical risk screening may not fully capture all risk exposures, potentially leading to under- or overestimation. While the scenario modelling and assessments provide valuable insights into possible climate-related impacts on the Group’s business, they are subject to inherent uncertainties.

Feedback and Questions

Sustainability
Singapore